Skip to main content

Riverine Disputes 2






                                     Grand Renaissance Dam. Source:(US/C,2020)


Development of Riverine dispute frameworks

 

Yoffe (2003,9) has found that extreme events of conflicts were more commonly found in areas with highly variable hydrologic conditions. Africas erratic climates provide ideal conditions for conflict. International frameworks have been developed to assist the resolution of competing national demands for river water (The Helsinki Rules 1966 and the UN Watercourse Convention 1997)(Demin,2015). These controls are often frustratingly abstract, and neither Ethiopia or Egypt have ratified them(Tanzi,2020). International frameworks seek to allocate rights by determining what is reasonable and equitable and further refer to historic use of the water source(Wolf,2009). However, ‘reasonable and equitable’ are subjective and unquantifiable measures. Furthermore these agreements have neither been developed or enforced by international courts.

 

Historically two contrasting positions have been taken in relation to riverine disputes: The Harmon Doctrine, which considers that a nation has complete control of the waterways within its own border, and therefore favours Ethiopia. The second position looks to favour at historic use of a river, thus favouring Egypt(Wolf,2009). The UN Watercourse Convention (1997) is the most relevant treaty framework for solving international disputes over use of cross-border river systems(Tanzi,2020).   



Claims of Equity?



Egypt still view a treaty signed in 1902 by Great Britain and Ethiopia - which agrees that Ethiopia disclaim any right to the Nile - as legally binding (Tvedt,2017). Further, Egypt would quote Article 7 of the UNWConvention which imposes  ‘a duty on states to take measures to prevent causing significant harms to other states sharing an international watercourse’(Tanzi,2020,624). Thus Egypt has a right to limit development in the upper riparian region of the Nile. In contrast, Ethiopia would quote Article 5 which permits riparian states sharing an international watercourse to utilise the watercourse in an equitable and reasonable manner’(Tanzi,2020,625). 


The lack of accurate data in these regions makes it increasingly difficult to address claims made by either side. Yoffe (2003) looked at 49 treaties addressing riverine disputes. The majority of these treaties favour riverine users with the longest historical claim. While political threats have increased from both sides, it is possible that the conflict could be decided by the political allegiances of large nation-states, whose investments carry large political weight. 

 

Always conflict?

 

Issues over rivers crossing different borders are not always shaped by conflict; in fact Yoffe (2003) found that between 1948-1999 in 122 international river basins, cooperative incidents (67%) greatly exceeded that of conflictive (28%) events. There have been attempts in the Nile region for greater cooperation. The Nile Basin initiative (signed by all ten riparian countries of the Nile) seeks to develop the River Nile in a cooperative manner through an increase in regional intergovernmental partnership (NBI,2020).


Attached is a video that looks at the conflict in depth



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction

I have been very privileged to explore different subsections of the African continent, through different expeditions.   On each trip I have experienced various levels of luxury, from a safari to school trips and charity missions.  While I believe I have only scraped the surface in my exploration of this continent, one thing has become abundantly clear. Africa is diverse. Diverse in culture, diverse in politics, diverse in economics and diverse in the issues it faces. Two of these issues are things I have been lucky to take for granted in my life: Food and Water. In this introductory blog I shall provide some context to the interconnected nature of these two resources, while exploring some of the opportunities and barriers to development. Water  Water provision in Africa is incredibly complex, demonstrated by difficulty in providing a universally accepted metric to measure it. Falkenmark’s Water Stress index is one of the most popular: it states that a country is water-stressed if i

The Potential of Groundwater

The volume of groundwater in Africa is estimated to be 600,000 km 3 but it doesn’t get the attention it deserves  (Macdonald,2012) . To put this in perspective, that is 100 times more than the ‘ renewable freshwater resources ' and 20 times more than the  freshwater  in African lakes. Furthermore, Falkenmark’s Water Stress Index, once seen as a definitive measure of water scarcity in Africa, only measures water scarcity through river discharge, completely ignoring groundwater!    Today I will discuss the potential of groundwater irrigation, particularly focusing on the Sub-Saharan region of Africa.  Groundwater Distribution    There are many different  groundwater irrigation schemes in Africa through privately as well as publicly funded projects. Specifically, Sub-Saharan Africa has huge potential for increased agricultural production as only 3.3% of arable land is irrigated , compared to 37% of arable land in Asia (Vilhoth,2013) .   Picture 1   (Macdonald,2012,5) This shows tha

A Virtual Approach to Water

What is Virtual Water? The term Virtual water was first coined by John Allan in the 1990s  (Hoekstra, 2003 ).    Put simply, it seeks to recognise the significant use of water in countries' resources, including that of food, and to encourage countries which have a low stockpile of water to import water intensive food products, so as to lower the strain on their country's water supply. The volume of virtual water  ‘ hidden ’  or  ‘ embodied’    in a particular product is defined as the volume of water used in the production process of that product. The volume of virtual water transfer is so great that in Middle Eastern and North African countries, it exceeds the outflow of the Nile in a year  (Allan, 2003) . The simple fact is, food needs water. Grain is an often-used example: one kilogram requires 1000kg to 2000kg of water. Between 5000-6000kg of water is needed for a kilo of cheese ( Hoekstra, 2003 ) . Thus, there is a huge amount of water hidden within our food. Allen (2003)